Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse


The Matilda case has crystallized in several new words that become symbols of a new destructive discourse. Actually, for this matter and was started. So.
Orthodox LIH, Orthodox Taliban, Orthodox Jihad, Orthodox terrorism.
How do you apogee apotheosis? The point is, it does not matter whether you believe or not, what religion you belong to - Russians are tightly associated with Orthodoxy. Both outside and inside. Understand what the next step?
The matter itself, as usual, works for a split in society. We hang a rag on a mop and require a hard to decide on her about. In the end, you have to take a side and hate another. His compatriots. Unusually there is another.
It is absolutely impossible to understand who exactly should be hated. And it is not very clear for what reason. This is some kind of phantom. Who are all these "forces" who allegedly threaten it is not clear than it is not clear to whom? They exist somewhere outside of twitter, from where they are blown up to incredible sizes by the media of all calibers - from company to strategic?
And what about the other "side"? - Yes, the same mirage. A feature film that no one has seen.
And this battle of shadows on the LCD walls with pleasure is commented on by radio leaders of Jewish nationality, savoring the attachment of the adjective "Orthodox" to all kinds of nastiness. Even a citizen of Puchkov did not escape the plague fad and also used a couple of such expressions.
A simple man in the street in such a situation falls into prostration, but still begins to fear something. For example, he starts looking askance at the Orthodox neighbors: well, how do they carry out terrorist plans? And these very neighbors are against him: because Orthodoxy seems to be under attack, isn't it? It's funny, I want to cry.
“The vile commies have tortured the holy king, and now they want to destroy the holy faith, by showing a movie about him and some kind of ballerina.”

Rave? - Perfect! However, this madness is the essence of the conflict.

These virtual “activists” against which social group are protesting? Against movie viewers? Against the Bolsheviks in the person of the director Teacher and the owner of the network of cinemas Mamut? Rave? - Yeah, read the paragraph above.
The “objective” citizens add their fair share.For example, such types: “I am Orthodox, but I don’t like the ROC” or “I normally treat believers, but I hate the ROC”. Such people act on the principle of "scum, but this is our bastard." If they hear assaults, the most ugly and dishonest in the ROC, then they are silent or even speak from an “objective” position:
- Slightly overkill, but of course, the ROC should not ...
It is always nice when someone “kicks” your “opponent” painfully.
The same applies to citizens of the ROC itself. They also move away from assessments or confirm, only by softening the wording.
This is all a very wrong and dangerous position. Beat is not only in the ROC. And on the Russian Orthodox Church, on Orthodoxy and on the Russian as a whole. In Russia. And someone does not want to support his "enemy", so he supports a global blow to everything in general.
This is an old topic and it works. For example, Internet harassment of phenomena through their extremes. Have you seen the rise of the tag "yazhemat"? Take for example ten uporotyh and shed shit on motherhood in principle. The trick is that no one will intercede for them. This is obviously sick ladies on the head, they can only be scolded. And try to stand up - so the community will flood you, associating you with these unfortunates.Therefore, all together they laugh at motherhood.
So here. There is no real enemy. There are shadows on the wall in the most grotesque way for each of the imaginary sides of an imaginary conflict. You can only beat and hate them. Here we all beat, hate and fear.
Profit!
If someone suddenly thinks that the author of the text is so cunning and insightful and avoided this excitement of hatred from scratch, so no, he did not escape. A good weapon also affects those who understand the principles of its operation. I hate it too. Those who invented and implemented this shemku. And most of all, because I do not know who it is. I understand one thing for sure: this is not Poklonskaya — she is a pawn in this game.

Related news

  • Pubs, cafes, restaurants: a selection of sites
  • How to save sex after the wedding
  • Works from the book Ukrainian Erotic Photography (18)
  • Briton made a wedding cake in the form of a bride worth 1,000,000
  • Veterinary Forums: a selection of sites

  • Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse

    Postmodern Speaking. New jihad discourse